|
Why God Won't Heal Amputees? |
|
Here's a more important question for the atheist community: If it can be proven that he does, will you believe in Him? Since MindNuke.com was posted we have heard two separate and unverified reports from people who had no idea this was a heated point among internet atheists. These were two eyewitness accounts of God "growing back an eyeball" and "a hand out of a dead stump". Both were on gospel missions to remote locations that do not have access to hospitals. Reminding us, humanity constantly misunderstands our own predicament. In the vast majority of cases, it is up to humanity to rescue ourselves with what God provided in advance. God reserves the right to intervene and overrule at will. Evidently, he does so more reportedly in distant rural places where: 1) there is a strong conviction that he can do anything according with his purpose, and 2) where society is unable to help in any other significant ways. Amputees experience emotional pain and other complications. We should not give up hope or disqualify God from helping relieve suffering and distress in ways other than creating body parts. Just because a handful of internet atheists with NO critical examination of the facts feel they have believers on the run with one insensitive question. However, the power to regenerate limbs is available to certain creatures like: Salamanders. So it's a little like asking, "Why won't God make people breath underwater?" It would spare a lot of suffering, but we have numerous ways to mitigate the worst dangers by learning to think cautiously, and clearly. A striking piece of information came forward since MindNuke.com first published material on Salamanders. A breakthrough in human limb regeneration based on the study of Salamander DNA -Apparently, human beings have most of the code necessary for limb regeneration. So we can all agree on this point 100% - it is physically possible to grow back limbs without divine intervention. A more relevant question for evolutionists now, in light of this new information, would be this: Why doesn't evolution grow back (more species) limbs? It would support Neo-Darwinian and Paradise Lost concepts both very nicely if this was in past times the norm, not the exception. As it stands, God will not create at the whim of humanity, and neither will evolution. This is information theory. God "rested" from adding creations a long time ago. Creating in our age is a bigger miracle than parting the Red (Reed) Sea (reportedly duplicated for Alexander the great and his men). Yet know this, God can not be obligated into healing anyone or performing signs and wonders. This is the paradise mindset. The God of the Bible makes numerous promises to physically restore creation -once lawlessness has fully exhausted its course. The fact that human beings expect God to heal is itself a sign. A sign that we subconsciously understand - only he is able to rightfully restore and to create "out of nothing". When God does choose to heal, he seemingly creates nothing, only restores out of what is present. This as a rule with a few exceptions is reserved for special occasions. Our free will to believe God or not, is a factor. In just casually reading the Bible, one will quickly notice: miracles have rarely been enough to convince anyone. This question is an example of when the majority of people choose to rally around the minority of people, and obstruct either one of them from receiving the truth. The mentality behind the "Why Won't God Heal Amputees?" question fails to examine the big picture. Namely the accumulation of the moral, physical, and spiritual repercussions of breaking up with God. Who is the origin of law, life, and love. The Creator has already revealed (in numerous ways), his aims are much higher than the grief of any one individual. Principally, this is in the form of hope and promises. Of the "new body", the "new Earth", and the "new Heaven". By the way, Jesus Christ responded to this question 2000-years ago:
|