What Happened to Tyrannosaurus Rex?

Dinosaurs are the official mascot of  naturalism. Of them all, none is more exciting than Tyrannosaurus Rex. Now a days, even grade school students have working theories about dinosaur extinction. All except the one most of the evidence is pointing to.

Have you ever looked at a good fossil map? Probably you haven't. The lack of exhaustive "fossil maps" is curious. We imagine the absence is partially to do with the neglected study of: fossil graveyards caused by flash floods. That, and the desire to keep us faithful as to the importance of depth.

A casual search will show you, there are a lot more flood graveyards than is generally admitted.

Flooding is directly responsible for, by some estimations, billions of fossilizations. Naturalists are very cautious to avoid placing emphasis on any flood explanation whatsoever. Yet, most kinds of fossilization actually require the presence of water and rapid sedimentation (or at the least, special conditions that are virtually non-existent today). Contrary to common knowledge, fossilization can be a very rapid process (fossil hat).

The one decent fossil map we were able to get our hands on makes something clear that popular science certainly does not. Flood graveyards make up the majority of the fossil record.

Here are some interesting facts about the most popular dinosaur of them all:

An abstract view of the available data points to a number of ideas:

1]T-Rex's fossilized with flood waters. 2] T-Rex's populated few and remote territories abundant with wildlife. 3] T-Rex's are contemporaries of the un-extinct: Garfish, Shark, Snail, Ray, Frog, Lizard, Salamander, etc. 4] T.Rex's could have existed in recent history, with no special difficulty, as evidenced by the lack of evolution, and or extinction, of the above named creatures, surface tracks, and soft tissue (image). 5] If T-Rex was a scavenger + feeder of opportunity, there is no difficulty casting it as a walking carrion disposal. Reptile vision, and a powerful sense of smell is consistent with an animal who's giantism was stimulated by a diet of giant carrion and robust living conditions. T-Rex's form actually appears to be balanced by leaning mouth first onto huge carrion. 

There are many other dinosaurs that can safely be considered a "T-Rex." The proliferation of classification based on partial fossil finds (in many cases a single tooth) is a misrepresentation. It is an enlargement on the data.

Many re-names are attached to Dinosaurs for the sake of vanity alone. "Albertosaurus" so named  for being found in Alberta Canada. Well, Albertosaurus is still another name for "Tyrannosaurs Rex."

The few dozen that were found all died suddenly. In a flood together. Also, along side an assortment of other flood victims. All stacked together in a river bend, which has led to speculation these beasts were pack hunters. Or else - they were their own worst enemies.

Rajasaurus is similar to T-Rex, but with a small crest of horns, and rounded skull:

The Rajasaurus bones were first discovered in 1828 by Capt. William Seline. After being ignored for 175-years in 2003, Paleontologists found even more of them spread out on the Narmada River bank... Orthodox science didn't have much room in prehistory for Indian dinosaurs. After some modest prehistoric revisions, and an exceptionally long wait, Rajasaurus is an official mascot too.

Nearby Narmada Man could be (and is by some) considered homo sapien. His (partial) skull was found within a layer of volcanic ash. Also nearby: 600+ natural caves, and India's largest collection of prehistoric art.

There are persuasive reasons to consider the possibility of dinosaur/human co-existence:  Like human artifacts in supposedly ancient rock layers. A dinosaur fossil found inside a mammal's stomach, and the 2008 human/dinosaur footprints recovered from the Dinosaur Valley State Park. The park is characterized as an ancient seashore.