|
Which Came First? |
|
“Which came first the chicken or the egg?” is not without scientific validity. It doesn’t stop there either... Which came first the infant or the adult? Seed or plant? Interdependency is natural order. Ecology is hierarchical. The instantaneous formation of vital organs is more than likely, it is essential. Rapid evolution and simultaneous evolution are danced around nervously by most orthodox scientists - because it smacks of the supernatural. This is one reason we have seen such loyalty to hyperbolic estimations of the Earth's age. Without billions of years, the "which came first" question is unfathomable. And without answering the which came first question, science can prove practically nothing about the origin of life. As for us, we hold the simultaneous organization of critical systems to be self evident. The "which came first" question is taboo, because, there are simply no naturalistically verifiable answers to it. Even less so when the so-called "primitive life forms" like the Trilobite have some of the most sophisticated mechanisms (the eye of the Trilobite). We do believe in evolution at MindNuke.com, in so much as it is stating the obvious. That many animals are capable of environmental, cosmetic, aesthetic adaptations, but environmental adaptations fail to explain the existence of the original archetypes and organized interdependence. Looking at the (highly debatable) notion of a dinosaur evolving into a bird. How would its body generate the DNA for feathers, hollow bones, and wings? Provided that it just did. Which feature would appear first? What would provoke it? Radiation? Jumping a lot? Tree climbing? Diving off a cliff to an early death in front of a prodigy? What urge for flight would afford an unsuspecting life form millions of years of trial and error? It is a great stretch of imagination to think that any animal could evolve flight before it learned “I can’t fly.”
Read more on this topic in the book: Key of God: The Last Secrets
|