|
Which Came First? |
|
“Which came first the chicken or the egg?” is not without scientific validity. It doesn’t stop there either... Which came first the infant or the adult? Seed or plant? Interdependency is natural order. Ecology is hierarchical. The instantaneous formation of vital organs is more than likely, it is essential. Rapid evolution and simultaneous evolution are danced around nervously by most orthodox scientists - because it smacks of the supernatural. This is one reason we have seen such loyalty to hyperbolic estimations of the Earth's age. Still, the age old question has an officially sanctioned final answer. (An agreement with Genesis.) As for us, we hold the simultaneous organization of all critical systems to be self evident. We do believe in evolution at MindNuke.com, in so much as it is stating the obvious. That many animals are capable of environmental, cosmetic, and aesthetic adaptations. But that environmental adaptations fail to explain the existence of the original archetypes, and organized interdependence in every system vital for life. Looking at the (highly debatable) notion of a dinosaur evolving into a bird. How would its body generate the DNA for feathers, hollow bones, and wings? Provided that it just did. Which feature would appear first? What would provoke it? Radiation? Jumping a lot? Tree climbing? Diving off a cliff to an early death in front of a prodigy? What urge for flight would afford an unsuspecting archetype, millions of years of trial and error? It is a great stretch of imagination to think that any animal could evolve the dangerous and complex ability of flight before it learned “I can’t fly.”
Read more on this topic in the book: Key of God: The Last Secrets
|